Digital Age and Medicine: Visualization and Evaluation of Foot Anatomy with Artificial Intelligence
Yazarlar (6)
Dr. Öğr. Üyesi Ferda Başgün Firat Üniversitesi, Türkiye
Dr. Öğr. Üyesi Tuba Altunbey Firat Üniversitesi, Türkiye
Dr. Öğr. Üyesi Sevinç Ay Doğru Türkiye
Dr. Öğr. Üyesi Derya ÖZTÜRK SÖYLEMEZ Sinop Üniversitesi, Türkiye
Arş. Gör. Elif Emre Türkiye
Nurseda Başgün
Makale Türü Açık Erişim Özgün Makale (SSCI, AHCI, SCI, SCI-Exp dergilerinde yayınlanan tam makale)
Dergi Adı DIAGNOSTICS (Q1)
Dergi ISSN 2075-4418 Dergi Bilgileri (2025)
Dergi Tarandığı Indeksler SCI-Expanded
Makale Dili Ingilizce Basım Tarihi 03-2025
Kabul Tarihi – Yayınlanma Tarihi 25-02-2025
Cilt / Sayı / Sayfa 15 / 5 / 1–17 DOI 10.3390/diagnostics15050550
Makale Linki https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4418/15/5/550#
UAK Araştırma Alanları
Mimarlık, Planlama ve Tasarım
Özet
Background/Objectives: Artificial intelligence (AI) has attracted great interest due to its applicability in many fields. The adoption of visual illustration techniques produced by AI in the field of graphic design has further expanded the field of use of this technology. This study focuses on foot anatomy illustrations generated by Adobe Firefly and Microsoft Designer Image Creator applications, evaluating them based on detail, clarity, anatomical realism, accuracy, and aesthetic appeal. Methods: The illustrations were created using text-based scripts, and five anatomists compared them to traditional illustrations from the Sobotta Atlas of Human Anatomy. Results: Fleiss’ Kappa statistic was used to analyze consistency among expert evaluations. For the four figures generated by both AI applications, Fleiss’ Kappa agreement was high. Adobe Firefly performed slightly better in illustrating phalanx and ankle bones, but its anatomical accuracy was lower for tarsal and metatarsal bones. Microsoft Designer Image Creator excelled in illustrating metatarsal bones, while its tarsal and phalanx illustrations were less anatomically accurate than Adobe Firefly and the atlas drawings. Both programs showed average realism in ankle structures, while the tarsal bones had low realism. Conclusions: Artificial intelligence applications within the scope of the study showed fast performance. Aesthetic appeal is dominant at first glance in the resulting drawings. In general, both applications have struggled to reflect anatomical reality.
Anahtar Kelimeler
medical illustration | foot anatomy | artificial intelligence
BM Sürdürülebilir Kalkınma Amaçları
Atıf Sayıları
Web of Science 1
Digital Age and Medicine: Visualization and Evaluation of Foot Anatomy with Artificial Intelligence

Paylaş

İletişim
  • Korucuk Mahallesi Selanik Caddesi No:21
  • unis@sinop.edu.tr 0 368 271 57 57
Sosyal Media
Talentsoft Yazılım Talent Yazılım
Tasarım ve Programlama #2025