Effects of Some Active and Passive Recovery Techniques on Strength Parameters
Yazarlar (5)
Prof. Dr. Ahmet MOR Sinop Üniversitesi, Türkiye
Prof. Dr. Gökhan İpekoğlu Sinop Üniversitesi, Türkiye
Prof. Dr. Cansel ARSLANOĞLU Sinop Üniversitesi, Türkiye
Doç. Dr. Kürşat ACAR Sinop Üniversitesi, Türkiye
Prof. Dr. Erkal ARSLANOĞLU Sinop Üniversitesi, Türkiye
| Makale Türü |
Özgün Makale
(Diğer hakemli uluslarası dergilerde yayınlanan tam makale)
|
||
| Dergi Adı | International journal of Science Culture and Sport | ||
| Dergi ISSN | 2148-1148 | ||
| Dergi Tarandığı Indeksler | SPORT Discus | ||
| Makale Dili | İngilizce | Basım Tarihi | 12-2017 |
| Kabul Tarihi | – | Yayınlanma Tarihi | 01-01-2017 |
| Cilt / Sayı / Sayfa | 5 / 25 / 252–262 | DOI | 10.14486/IntJSCS676 |
| Makale Linki | http://www.iscsjournal.com/DergiTamDetay.aspx?ID=676 | ||
| UAK Araştırma Alanları |
Antrenman Bilimi
|
||
| Özet |
| Aim The purpose of this study was to determine theacute effect of short term active and passive recovery methods on strengthafter high intensity interval training (HIIT). Method Twelve trained malebodybuilders (18–30 years of age) voluntary participated in the study, on avoluntary basis. The criteria for the athletes were being healthy, not havingany chronic or acute disorders, and not having restrictions on movement due toinjuries.Subjects applied randomly active and passive recovery techniques(Electrostimulation, core training, control) after each HIIT on three differentdays. Performance tests were conducted on athletes before (Pre-T) and afterHIIT (Post-T). The data collected were analysed with dependent two sample ttest and independent samples t test. Results Although there was an increase inthe anaerobic strength, vertical jump, and back strength levels, nostatistically significant difference was found in between groups (p>0,01).Similarly, a decrease was found in the levels of leg strength and right-lefthandgrip strength in three groups. Although the difference in the control groupwas not meaningful in terms of these values, there was a significant differencein the right-left hand grip strength levels in the core training andstimulation groups (p<0,01). Pre-Tthe values of right-left handgrip strength in the core training group decreasedfrom 48,46±5,06 to 46,16±5,84, from 47,95±5,44, to 46,50±5,43 respectivelycompared to Post-T (p<0,01). In the electrostimulation group, on the otherhand, Pre-T the right handgrip strength decreased from 47,36±4,48 to 45,72±5,31while Pre-T the left handgrip strength decreased from 46,45±4,27 to 44,13±5,05 … |
| Anahtar Kelimeler |
BM Sürdürülebilir Kalkınma Amaçları
| Atıf Sayıları | |
| Google Scholar | 3 |