Acute Effects of Dynamic Stretching and Foam Rolling Warm-Up Protocols on Certain Performance Parameters in Canoeists
Yazarlar (5)
Gaye Kanık
Arş. Gör. Zehra KARGIN Sinop Üniversitesi, Türkiye
Doç. Dr. Fatih Karakaş Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi, Türkiye
Halil Keskin
Prof. Dr. Ahmet MOR Sinop Üniversitesi, Türkiye
Makale Türü Açık Erişim Özgün Makale (Diğer hakemli uluslarası dergilerde yayınlanan tam makale)
Dergi Adı Herkes için Spor ve Rekreasyon Dergisi
Dergi ISSN 2687-6027
Dergi Tarandığı Indeksler SPORT Discus
Makale Dili İngilizce Basım Tarihi 09-2025
Kabul Tarihi 20-08-2025 Yayınlanma Tarihi 30-09-2025
Cilt / Sayı / Sayfa 7 / 3 / 427–437 DOI 10.56639/jsar.1698583
Makale Linki https://doi.org/10.56639/jsar.1698583
UAK Araştırma Alanları
Spor Bilimleri
Özet
This study aimed to investigate the acute effects of warm-up protocols involving dynamic stretching (DS) and foam rolling (FR) on specific performance parameters in canoe athletes. By examining the individual and combined effects of these two warm-up methods on performance, the study sought to provide a scientific basis for identifying the most effective warm-up strate-gy. A total of 13 volunteer flatwater canoe athletes (age: 13.07±1.32 years; training age: 3.07±1.32 years; height: 1.60±0.11 cm; body weight: 51.07±11.96 kg; body mass index: 19.61±2.79 kg/m²) participated in the study. The research employed a randomized, crossover, counterbalanced ex-perimental design and was conducted over three test days with 48-hour intervals. On each test day, participants were randomly assigned to one of three warm-up protocols: FR only, DS only, or a combination of FR+DS. Following each warm-up protocol, performance tests including ver-tical jump, visual reaction time, flexibility, back and leg strength, and balance were conducted. Additionally, the Borg Scale (RPE) was used to assess perceived exertion, and the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) was administered to rate delayed onset muscle soreness (DOMS). Differences be-tween variables were analyzed using repeated-measures ANOVA. The results revealed no statis-tically significant differences among the groups in terms of vertical jump, anaerobic power, back and leg strength, balance, RPE, VAS, or visual reaction time values (p>0.05). However, a statisti-cally significant difference was observed in flexibility values between the FR and FR+DS groups (p<0.05). In conclusion, the FR+DS warm …
Anahtar Kelimeler