Bibliometric and content analysis of ChatGPT research in nursing education: The rabbit hole in nursing education
Yazarlar (2)
Dr. Öğr. Üyesi Turgay YALÇINKAYA Sinop Üniversitesi, Türkiye
Prof. Dr. Şebnem Çınar Yücel Ege Üniversitesi, Türkiye
| Makale Türü | Özgün Makale (SSCI, AHCI, SCI, SCI-Exp dergilerinde yayınlanan tam makale) | ||
| Dergi Adı | Nurse Education in Practice (Q1) | ||
| Dergi ISSN | 1471-5953 Dergi Bilgileri (2024) | ||
| Dergi Tarandığı Indeksler | SCI-Expanded | ||
| Makale Dili | İngilizce | Basım Tarihi | 05-2024 |
| Kabul Tarihi | – | Yayınlanma Tarihi | 01-05-2024 |
| Cilt / Sayı / Sayfa | 77 / 1 / 103956–0 | DOI | 10.1016/j.nepr.2024.103956 |
| Makale Linki | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2024.103956 | ||
| UAK Araştırma Alanları |
Hemşirelik Esasları
|
||
| Özet |
| AimThis study was conducted to perform the bibliometric and content analysis of ChatGPT studies in nursing education.BackgroundChatGPT is an artificial intelligence-based chatbot developed by OpenAI. The benefits and limitations of the use of ChatGPT in nursing education are still discussed; however, it is a tool having potential to be used in nursing education.DesignBibliometric and content analysis.MethodsThe study data were scanned through Scopus and Web of Science. Bibliometric analysis was carried out with VOSViewer and Bibliometrix software. In the bibliometric analysis, science mapping and performance analysis techniques were used. Various bibliometric data, including most cited publications, journals and countries, were analyzed and visualized. The synthetic knowledge synthesis method was used in content analysis.ResultsWe analyzed 53 publications to which 151 authors contributed. The … |
| Anahtar Kelimeler |
| Artificial intelligence | Bibliometrics analysis | ChatGPT | Nursing education | Nursing students | OpenAI |
Science Direct
Bibliometric and content analysis of ChatGPT research in nursing education: The rabbit hole in nursing education
BM Sürdürülebilir Kalkınma Amaçları
| Atıf Sayıları | |
| Web of Science | 33 |
| Scopus | 36 |
| Google Scholar | 45 |