Morphological anatomical and palynological studies on Helichrysum plicatum DC subsp plicatum DC and Helichrysum plicatum DC subsp polyphyllum Ledeb Asteraceae
Yazarlar (4)
Doç. Dr. Ömer ELKIRAN Sinop Üniversitesi, Türkiye
Prof. Dr. Eyüp Bağcı Fırat Üniversitesi, Türkiye
Ahmet Harun Evren Fırat Üniversitesi, Türkiye
Makale Türü Açık Erişim Özgün Makale (Diğer hakemli uluslarası dergilerde yayınlanan tam makale)
Dergi Adı Bitlis Eren University Journal of Science and Technology
Dergi ISSN 2146-7706
Dergi Tarandığı Indeksler Diğer Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi
Makale Dili İngilizce Basım Tarihi 12-2015
Kabul Tarihi Yayınlanma Tarihi 28-12-2015
Cilt / Sayı / Sayfa 5 / 2 / 81–87 DOI 10.17678/beujst.72658
Makale Linki https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/566136
UAK Araştırma Alanları
Bitki Morfolojisi ve Anatomisi
Özet
In this study, Helichrysum plicatum DC. subsp.  plicatum DC. and Helichrysum plicatum DC. subsp.  polyphyllum (Ledeb.)  (Asteraceae) represented in the genus Helichrysum were investigated for the taxonomical purposes. The specimens belonging to both species were collected different locations from Turkey and investigated in view of morphological, morphometrical, anatomical and palynological features to determine the similarity and differences between two taxa. Anatomical studies were carried out on the stem and root characters with the Light microscope and illustrated. Pollen features of both species were observed with the Light and Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM). Both species were found different in length of internodes , cauline leaves leaf apices, phyllaries apices, phyllaries shapes of the upper and the lower facial hairs features from each others. The plants have woody root anatomy and the stem is herbaceous. The pollen type of both taxa were determined as trycolporate, Helichrysum plicatum subsp. plicatum pollen shape was spheroidal as Helichrysum plicatum subsp. polyphyllum pollen shape was oblata-spheroidal and reticular pollen ornemantation was observed. Consequently, there are some morphological,  morphometrical and palynological differences in both species, however, no significant differences were determined in view of anatomical features. The findings obtained from the study were discussed with each other and the genus patterns.
Anahtar Kelimeler