The Validity And Reliability Of The Turkish Version Of The Online Counseling And Face-To-Face Counseling Attitudes Scale
Yazarlar (3)
Doç. Dr. İbrahim DEMİRCİ Sinop Üniversitesi, Türkiye
Prof. Dr. Ali Haydar Şar Sakarya Üniversitesi, Türkiye
Dr. Öğr. Üyesi Abdullah Manap Batman Üniversitesi, Türkiye
Makale Türü Açık Erişim Özgün Makale (Diğer hakemli uluslarası dergilerde yayınlanan tam makale)
Dergi Adı International Journal of Psychology and Educational Studies
Dergi ISSN 2148-9378
Makale Dili İngilizce Basım Tarihi 09-2014
Kabul Tarihi – Yayınlanma Tarihi 01-09-2014
Cilt / Sayı / Sayfa 1 / 1 / 15–22 DOI 10.17220/ijpes.2014.01.002
Makale Linki http://www.ijpes.com/article/doi/10.17220/ijpes.2014.01.002
UAK Araştırma Alanları
Rehberlik ve Psikolojik Danışmanlık
Özet
The purpose of this study is to examine the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Online Counseling Attitudes Scale OCAS and Face-to-Face Counseling Attitudes Scale OCAS Rochlen, Beretvas, & Zack, 2004 . OCAS and FCAS loaded on four factors and the factors were named Value of Online Counseling OC-V , Discomfort with Online Counseling OC-D , Value of Face-to-Face Counseling FC-V and Discomfort with Face-to-Face Counseling FC-D . The results of confirmatory factor analysis indicated that the four dimensional model was well fit x²=323.61, df=157, p=0.00000, RMSEA=.056, NFI=.94, CFI=.96, IFI=.96, RFI=.92, GFI=.91, and SRMR=.071 . Factor loadings ranged from .47 to .88. The internal consistency coefficients of four subscales were .84, .80, .88 and .78. Overall, findings demonstrated that OCAS and FCAS may be used as a valid and reliable instrument in order to assess attitudes toward online counseling and face to face counseling of individuals.
Anahtar Kelimeler